I have an idea I want to discuss with everyone—are NFTs or digital assets like misprinted horses a bit like the misprinted monkey stamps in traditional collectibles?

Think about it, the reason why misprinted monkey stamps are valuable is mainly due to their rarity and non-fungibility. The same applies to misprinted horses, because due to manufacturing defects or version differences, they become one-of-a-kind items. The rarer the collection, the stronger the community consensus, and the easier it is to realize its value.

Of course, there are differences as well. Stamps are backed by national credit and historical significance, while the value of digital assets relies more on community consensus and ecosystem applications. But this logic actually holds—rarity + difficulty in forgery + practical use or collectible significance can support the asset's value.

What do you all think? Does this analogy hold?