History rhymes. The 1980s Japanese playbook showed us this pattern pretty clearly: throw enough money at your manufacturing sector, and sure, you can dominate global markets for a while. But here's the catch—that competitive edge is built on sand. The economics don't actually work. You end up with an industry that looks strong on paper but is structurally broken, completely dependent on the tap staying open. Stop the subsidies, and the whole thing collapses.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ContractExplorervip
· 6h ago
Burning money to gain market share, but in the end, you still have to pay back the debt. That Japanese approach is now obvious to everyone.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 6h ago
Japan's Nawa's operation was truly amazing, burning money to create a mirage, but in the end, it still failed.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruantvip
· 6h ago
It's ironic that some people still think this will work, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 6h ago
Still watching the Japanese bubble history at 3 a.m... To be honest, subsidies are just a liquidity illusion; once drained, the truth comes out. I calculated the data for Japan in the 1980s, and the subsidy dependency was as high as 73%. This kind of structural break will inevitably lead to a crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)