2026-01-14 08:29:09

With large-scale legal revision proposals on the table, questions arise—can such reforms truly make the legal system more complete and comprehensive? Or do cumbersome procedures instead hinder efficiency and make things more complicated? Finding this balance is indeed worth pondering. From a regulatory perspective, comprehensive legal revisions can indeed fill gaps and improve the framework; but from an operational standpoint, lengthy revision cycles, multiple approvals, and interest negotiations... these can all cause the entire process to slow down. Sometimes, the pursuit of perfection can be the enemy of progress.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfIsEmpty

· 9h ago

Once again, it's the same old story. More regulation is actually stifling the ecosystem, and it's better to loosen up and let the market self-regulate for faster development.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 9h ago

It's that old cliché of the "perfection vs. efficiency" dichotomy again. While it's not wrong, there's nothing new about it. The real problem is that those people simply can't push forward... What's the use of just changing the terms on paper? Without changing the underlying execution mechanism, everything is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 9h ago

To be honest, the reform ultimately turns into all parties fighting each other, and what comes out is a mess... It's really better to take small, quick steps.

View OriginalReply0