The U.S. Senate Banking Committee is about to review and amend the Crypto Market Structure Act, with lawmakers submitting over 130 amendments. These amendments cover several key areas: some call for a complete ban on stablecoin yield generation, some attempt to restrict public officials from profiting from crypto assets, and others involve definitions and adjustments for mixers, roll-up tools, and similar instruments.
Notably, the proposals are not from a single party; both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are involved. This reflects that crypto market regulation has become a bipartisan focus. From stablecoin regulation to conflicts of interest among executives, and to the standardization of privacy tools, each amendment represents different regulatory ideas and policy tendencies. The outcome of this week's review will directly influence the future compliance framework of the crypto industry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropLicker
· 7h ago
Over 130 amendments? This is to tighten control over the crypto industry to the extreme.
Prohibition of yield on stablecoins, bans on public officials holding coins, and regulation of mixers... the coverage is really extensive.
Both parties are involved, what does this mean? It means no one can stay out of it.
Once this week's review is finished, our compliance framework will be finalized. It feels like the days are getting tougher and tougher.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 7h ago
Over 130 amendments? Are they planning to really mess up the crypto world?
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 7h ago
Is it coming to ban earnings again? Feels like a new trick to cut the leeks again
Banning stablecoin earnings? How is that different from bank deposits...
These people really want to kill crypto completely. Bipartisan cooperation is here
Over 130 amendments, why not just ban it all directly
Mixers are about to be shut down, no privacy left
Both parties agree on regulation, okay, then they can tax us together later
Another conflict of interest and privacy tool. If this bill passes, the crypto world will cry
Waiting to see the show on Friday, anyway, they’re just taking our wool in the end
Feels like there’s no good news... this wave will drop again
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 7h ago
Over 130 amendments? Dude, are you trying to kill the crypto industry?
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 7h ago
Over 130 amendments? This pace is a bit outrageous, it seems like regulatory authorities want to crush crypto completely.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 8h ago
Over 130 amendments? This is not regulation, it's just playing word games.
---
Another ban on stablecoin yields? A bunch of people who don't understand finance are just messing around.
---
Both parties have taken action, it seems that crypto is really about to change.
---
Mixers are under scrutiny... friends, we need to be more discreet.
---
Different regulatory approaches = fighting each other, in the end, nothing gets passed.
---
Restricting public officials from profiting? Let's see how they operate first.
---
What’s the use of this week's deliberation results? Anyway, they keep changing the same old tune.
---
Stablecoins are going to fade? The lifeblood of DeFi will be cut off.
---
Over 130 amendments... are members of Congress just bored?
---
Standardizing privacy tools is just another way of saying "banning" them.
The U.S. Senate Banking Committee is about to review and amend the Crypto Market Structure Act, with lawmakers submitting over 130 amendments. These amendments cover several key areas: some call for a complete ban on stablecoin yield generation, some attempt to restrict public officials from profiting from crypto assets, and others involve definitions and adjustments for mixers, roll-up tools, and similar instruments.
Notably, the proposals are not from a single party; both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are involved. This reflects that crypto market regulation has become a bipartisan focus. From stablecoin regulation to conflicts of interest among executives, and to the standardization of privacy tools, each amendment represents different regulatory ideas and policy tendencies. The outcome of this week's review will directly influence the future compliance framework of the crypto industry.