2026-01-13 22:29:14

There's a data accuracy issue worth flagging regarding $DOG's listing status. The asset is currently marked as HIGH RISK on a major exchange platform based on wallet data that bridges Bitcoin L1 to Solana. However, this classification appears disconnected from the actual Runes Protocol distribution metrics shown in the supporting documentation.

The core problem: the risk assessment seems tied to a single bridge validator wallet rather than reflecting the broader token distribution landscape across the Runes Protocol ecosystem. This creates a misleading picture for traders evaluating the asset's actual on-chain fundamentals.

A data refresh incorporating comprehensive Runes distribution snapshots would provide clearer transparency. The existing labeling doesn't align with the protocol's actual tokenomics structure. Worth resolving for anyone seriously researching $DOG's risk profile.

BTC4,69%

SOL5,3%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeSmellHunter

· 4h ago

It's another issue of misaligned data labels. The exchange marking $DOG in red is all because of a certain Bridge wallet, but the actual distribution is not like that at all.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 4h ago

Another operation with this kind of data black box, just one bridge wallet can categorize the entire token as HIGH RISK? Ridiculous

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 5h ago

Another tactic with this high-risk label again—one bridge wallet can determine the entire project's classification? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 5h ago

The data from the exchange seems unreliable all along. Judging it as HIGH RISK based solely on a bridging wallet? That's really outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 5h ago

Data, once distorted, needs to be smashed. The exchange's labeling this time is indeed a bit outrageous. Wait, a single bridging wallet can determine the risk level? How does that logic make sense? You need to look at the full picture, everyone. The $DOG case shows that just looking at surface labels can lead to being cut. Deep DYOR is truly urgent. They need to update the distribution data quickly. The current high-risk label is just a fake rocket, it can't fly at all.

View OriginalReply0