Know the difference between casual publishing and serious outlets. If you're just dropping content online, you can afford to be more relaxed with quality standards. But serious submissions? Academic papers? Major publications? Those demand better. Don't waste their time with anything below 75% quality. Here's the thing—political teams, marketing professionals, agencies—they all know this. Many actually use scoring tools to evaluate content quality before it goes live. It's become standard practice in the industry. Your content needs to clear that bar if you want it taken seriously.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rugdoc.eth
· 8h ago
The 75% threshold is indeed quite strict, but honestly, most people can't even reach this level.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 8h ago
The 75% threshold is well explained, but what the heck are the scoring tools you mentioned? I haven't heard of them...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 9h ago
Is the 75% standard a bit arbitrary? Who set it? Do all industry players really calculate it this way?
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 9h ago
75% this threshold is indeed tough, but honestly, most people can't even pass 50%, lol
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 9h ago
75% is a good benchmark, but to be honest, most people can't reach this level at all.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 9h ago
That 75% line is really a dead end, but it’s understandable—things casually thrown together are indeed different from serious drafts... The industry is all using scoring tools, while we’re still manually editing drafts.
Know the difference between casual publishing and serious outlets. If you're just dropping content online, you can afford to be more relaxed with quality standards. But serious submissions? Academic papers? Major publications? Those demand better. Don't waste their time with anything below 75% quality. Here's the thing—political teams, marketing professionals, agencies—they all know this. Many actually use scoring tools to evaluate content quality before it goes live. It's become standard practice in the industry. Your content needs to clear that bar if you want it taken seriously.