2026-01-13 18:45:04

A series of operations by the Flow project have attracted industry attention. The project support for users to transfer assets without private keys was initially praised, but then the attitude changed, causing dissatisfaction within the community. This practice of encouraging first and restricting later indeed exposes the Achilles' heel of decentralization.

From a technical perspective, keyless asset transfer involves the underlying logic of asset security, and the project's inconsistent policies have made many users feel betrayed. When on-chain transparency should be the core competitive advantage of the crypto world, such incidents undoubtedly weaken the industry's trust foundation.

Frequent similar incidents also serve as a reminder to practitioners and investors: when choosing projects, it is necessary to evaluate their governance stability and value orientation more cautiously. The industry needs more builders who truly uphold the promise of decentralization.

FLOW5,81%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeTillRetire

· 12h ago

Is it the same old story? Making promises first and then flipping the script, all the same. Flow's move this time is truly brilliant. Where's the promised decentralization? Policy flip-flopping is more deadly than technical bugs. They said no private keys, and now they changed their tune. Honestly. Decentralization has become a joke. Luckily, I got out early. Projects like this should just be directly PASSed. Nothing more to say. The sense of betrayal is overwhelming. Who still dares to trust their promises? The industry is so chaotic, why are people still rushing in?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 12h ago

It's the same old trick, first hype it up and then cut it down.

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 12h ago

It's the old story, where's the promised decentralization? Unpredictable, that's the kind of project I look down on. Another empty promise on paper, it's really getting on my nerves. Wait, isn't this a sign of a scam? What are they still daring to boast about centralization for, it's hilarious. They compromise so quickly, it shows they don't care about anything. This is exactly the kind of thing real Web3 should be wary of.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 12h ago

Back at it with this trick again? First give a sweetener and then cut it off. Flow's recent moves are really dragging things down. --- Where's the promised decentralization? Instead, policies are unpredictable, and users are being played like monkeys. --- Regarding transferring coins without a private key, this really hits the industry's bottom line. What are the project teams thinking? --- It's always the same. They change the rules only after we've entered. It's outrageous. --- Projects with poor governance stability should be eliminated. There's nothing more to say. --- Looking at this trend, we need to be more cautious when choosing projects. Don't just rely on promotional slogans. --- The industry needs some reliable builders. Stop being so unpredictable all the time.

View OriginalReply0