Believing in a project doesn't mean turning a blind eye to its difficulties. Dusk's prospects in the compliant finance sector are indeed promising, but the challenges it faces are equally real. Only by clearly understanding these issues can we have a more objective view of it.

From laboratory to market application, innovative technology must face the harsh realities of testing. Dusk is taking a highly demanding professional route — this path is more stable but also more difficult.

The most direct challenge comes from the technology itself. Integrating privacy protection, compliance requirements, and high performance—three seemingly contradictory demands—is not a simple engineering problem. After the mainnet launch, whether it can maintain stability under high concurrency pressure of real business needs time to verify. This isn't something promises can solve; only through practical experience can the answer be seen.

The battlefield of commercial competition is even more crowded. Not only is Dusk paying attention to the RWA track, but a large number of capable public chain projects are also eyeing this cake. In this competitive landscape, Dusk must prove that its privacy and compliance advantages are not just concepts but real values that competitors cannot replicate. This requires data and case studies to speak.

Global regulation is like a multi-dimensional maze. Regulatory advantages in Europe are obvious, but regulatory rules around the world vary widely. Whether Dusk's architecture can adapt flexibly to these differences and maintain competitiveness during long-term global expansion is a lasting test.

Ecosystem building has no shortcuts. To attract genuine institutional users and professional developers, patience is required. These users won't come just because of one or two positive news; they want to see the network's real security, operational efficiency, and practical application value. This is a process of repeated validation and gradual accumulation.

That said, Dusk's foundation is also solid. Its true strength lies in understanding the real needs of institutional-level users from the very beginning, rather than guessing. This forward-looking understanding comes from years of technical accumulation and market observation.

The support behind it is quite solid. The depth of communication between the team, regulatory authorities, and traditional financial institutions has cleared many potential obstacles for the project's development path. This is an advantage that other projects find difficult to replicate quickly.

Ecosystem cooperation has already taken substantial steps. Collaborations with licensed exchanges are not just concepts but real efforts to bring hundreds of millions of euros of real assets onto the chain. This practical significance is profound and proves the feasibility of the model.

Security design is integrated throughout. From the underlying consensus mechanism to privacy protection models, every layer has been carefully designed. This is not a problem that can be fixed with patches later; it has been thoroughly considered from the architecture stage.

Overall, the challenges Dusk faces are very real, but its advantages are equally strong. The key still depends on execution—whether the technology can be stable, whether the market can accept it, and whether regulations can cooperate. These are not things that can be quickly determined; they can only be gradually verified during development.