Testing out liquidity strategies on KEI with a single-sided SOL approach for staking, then running the same tactics on GAS with wider range parameters. Both protocols showing interesting dynamics when you push the parameters a bit—worth experimenting with if you're into optimizing yield across different token pairs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractTearjerker
· 4h ago
Unilateral SOL liquidity is indeed interesting, but tweaking the GAS parameters too broadly is really playing with fire...
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 4h ago
I've played with both kei and gas. The one-sided SOL strategy is indeed interesting, but if you widen the range parameters, does the risk also increase accordingly?
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 4h ago
Hey, can KEI's unilateral SOL really run? Need to give it a try.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 4h ago
Unilateral SOL liquidity mining, the parameter tuning space is indeed quite large, and the key is how much your computational power yield ratio can be improved.
Testing out liquidity strategies on KEI with a single-sided SOL approach for staking, then running the same tactics on GAS with wider range parameters. Both protocols showing interesting dynamics when you push the parameters a bit—worth experimenting with if you're into optimizing yield across different token pairs.