2026-01-13 18:07:13

The leading position may seem stable, but the likelihood of a change in ownership is extremely low—the key issue lies in the ceiling. Dropping from a height of 50 million to 18 million, this shrinkage not only affects the leader itself but also triggers a chain reaction.

Projects like Long Er, Long San, and the entire BSC ecosystem are all difficult to escape unscathed. This is not just a simple individual tragedy but an ecosystem-level dilemma. Dark horse projects and star projects will also be forced to adjust their expectations—when the leader's ceiling drops, their valuation space will also be continuously compressed. It's like the entire ecosystem's upward channel suddenly narrows, and the growth potential for newcomers is naturally greatly reduced. The cruelty of the market lies here: the decline of the leader will affect the entire on-chain ecosystem's imagination.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 5h ago

Basically, the leading project is dragging down the entire chain to be sacrificed. Damn, dropping from 50 million to 18 million, how can anyone tolerate such a decline? The ecological ceiling has lowered, what’s the point of playing with projects behind it? When the leader collapses, the entire BSC loses its imagination, it's really harsh. That's why I say don't go all-in on the leader; the risk is just too damn high. The most uncomfortable time is when the ceiling narrows; no one can escape. The entire ecosystem has been hijacked, for sure.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryer

· 5h ago

50 million to 18 million? This wave of leading projects collapsing has really dragged down the entire ecosystem, leaving newcomers with no way out. --- When the ceiling drops, the entire chain cools off. That's why I never go all-in on small projects. --- To put it simply, BSC now is just the leader unable to drive the market, and everything below has to follow along to be sacrificed. It's a bit hopeless. --- No one can save the ecosystem-level dilemma. Even the dark horse stars are useless. --- Looking at it this way, why buy second or third-tier projects? The upward channel is completely blocked. --- The most heartbreaking thing is that the decline of the leader has killed even the imagination. Truly a raw market cruelty. --- From 50 million to 18 million, the shrinkage is outrageous, and the whole chain feels trapped. --- No wonder everyone is fleeing. The leader underperforms, and the entire ecosystem suffers. With this logic, there's no way to gamble. --- When the ceiling is underestimated, the valuation space disappears. The latecomers are really too miserable.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 5h ago

If the leading project drops the ball, the entire ecosystem will be buried with it. This is the fate of the track. From 50 million to 18 million, in plain terms, the expectations have collapsed. How can subsequent projects rise? Once the ceiling drops, valuations are like being pressed to the floor and rubbed, making dark horses impossible. Once an ecological deadlock forms, it becomes a vicious cycle. Even efforts by Dragon II and Dragon III can't save themselves. If this wave of the BSC ecosystem can't be stabilized, the difficulty of subsequent financing can be imagined.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 5h ago

50 million down to 18 million, this is the ceiling of the leading project, everyone below has to suffer along When the ecological ceiling drops, the imagination space for the next wave is directly cut in half, this is the cruel part If the leader can't hold up, the entire BSC ecosystem story becomes hard to continue, no one can escape The drop is so severe, just the leader can't bear it, and second and third tier projects are under immense pressure Another round of valuation space being squeezed... The imagination of on-chain ecology has really been lowered This is the most heartbreaking part, when the leader declines, the entire chain dims along, no one can remain unaffected 50 million directly halved to 18 million? The problem of the ecological ceiling level, no one can save it

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 5h ago

The collapse of the leading project causes the entire ecosystem to collapse... From 50 million to 18 million, the projects behind have no way out. When the ceiling drops, the valuation space is squeezed to death, and that's the most heartbreaking part... This wave of BSC ecosystem needs serious reflection. If the leader can't stay stable, no one can expect to outperform. Still thinking about jumping in? Dream on, buddy. The decline of the leader = the entire chain's imagination is cut in half, no one can escape. This is the fate of on-chain ecosystems: the strong eat the weak, the weak fall to the bottom... From 50 million to 18 million, it seems just a number, but in reality, it's the collapse of the entire ecosystem's confidence. Lowered valuation space is essentially a death sentence for small projects. When the leader declines, all the dark horse projects' dreams are shattered... That's how ruthless this market is.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMotivator

· 5h ago

Once the leader falls, the entire boat is going down. BSC is currently in this situation, right? The ecological ceiling has been broken, and the latecomers are also following suit. Honestly, this is a game of hot potato collapsing. From 50 million to 18 million? That's outrageous. It feels like the entire ecosystem's imagination has been shattered. When the leader falls, new projects and dark horses can't escape. This wave has indeed hurt the ecosystem. The ceiling has been lowered, and the valuation space has been squeezed out. It's uncomfortable. This is why the fragility of on-chain ecosystems is so concerning—once the eggshell breaks, everything is over.

View OriginalReply0