2026-01-13 16:42:22

When thinking about why X succeeds, it ultimately comes down to the fact that the structure itself is different.

Whether it's YouTube, Netflix, or Instagram, all are one-way communication. The platform provides content, and users consume it. In contrast, X has been two-way from the start. Anyone can speak, and anyone can respond.

What’s even more interesting is the level of freedom this offers. Not only can people communicate opinions to those they can't meet in real life, but they can also mock or criticize. Regardless of right or wrong, this freedom itself attracts people. Some support it, while others respond to it. This interaction creates an ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiVeteran

· 15h ago

That's why I'm still hanging out on X; other platforms are really too boring.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 15h ago

Bidirectional interaction indeed captures the essence, but freedom also means chaos.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterBearish

· 15h ago

Bidirectional interaction indeed has magic, but what truly attracts people is that sense of disorder The thrill of information bombardment, competition among players... this is the true source of addiction That polite and modest approach on YouTube is long outdated The chaos on X has instead become an ecosystem, which is quite a good insight Unfiltered voices colliding are much more interesting than carefully curated content However, if this freedom lasts too long, it will eventually lead to another extreme So, chaos itself is the greatest attraction

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 15h ago

Bidirectional interaction is indeed the killer feature, but in the end, freedom has been corrupted by capital.

View OriginalReply0

DustCollector

· 15h ago

Really, two-way interaction is the way to go --- Basically, being able to argue with each other is what makes it interesting --- This level of freedom... sometimes going overboard can be quite troublesome --- The ecosystem is supported by arguing, it's hilarious --- Compared to passively browsing content, two-way interaction is indeed more addictive --- The problem is that too much freedom can lead to chaos? --- Forget it, I still love this indifferent atmosphere --- So ultimately, the platform is still a human arena of competition

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 15h ago

Yes, yes, yes, being bidirectional is the way to go --- Freedom is addictive, there's no way around it --- Complaining and arguing are definitely more satisfying than one-way transmission --- Is the ecosystem ≈ chaos? But it can indeed become active --- Compared to passive consumption, platforms that allow arguing definitely stand out --- That's why group chats are more engaging than watching videos --- The problem is that with more freedom, moderation can't keep up...

View OriginalReply0