A well-known team is advancing L2 solutions on the Ethereum ecosystem, abandoning the route of building independent public chains. The reason is straightforward—focus.
Choosing to build a layer 2 solution based on Ethereum L1 has obvious benefits: firstly, it directly inherits Ethereum's decentralization and security features without starting from scratch; secondly, it can access the large liquidity pools within the existing EVM ecosystem, avoiding the awkwardness of cold start.
The advantage of this approach is that the team can concentrate all their energy on the truly core task—building a tokenized stock market. No dispersion, no waste, focusing wholeheartedly on one thing. In an era where infrastructure is already sufficiently mature, this "leveraging" approach is actually more wise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketMonk
· 6h ago
Smart, no need to reinvent the wheel, just stand on the shoulders of Ethereum.
---
Another public chain dream shattered, turns out L2 is still the best.
---
Focusing on doing one thing, this approach is indeed convincing.
---
Leveraging strength to generate more strength sounds easy, but few actually do it.
---
Solving liquidity issues all at once is indeed convenient.
---
But can cold start be avoided? It seems that changing the approach still requires patience.
---
This time, avoiding the old path of independent public chains, a lesson learned.
---
Tokenization of stocks sounds like another hot trend?
---
The Ethereum ecosystem is really getting more competitive, all the opportunities are being snatched up.
---
Damn, finally a team has figured it out, no need to do everything themselves.
View OriginalReply0
PoolJumper
· 6h ago
Got it. This principle should have been followed a long time ago. Instead of starting from scratch, it's better to stay close to the big tree for shade.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 6h ago
Smart move, this way there's no need to reinvent the wheel. Focusing on the core business is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 6h ago
Smart, instead of digging your own pit, just stand on the shoulders of giants.
---
L2 is the right path, it's convenient and reliable.
---
The true focus manual—learning from not messing with independent public chains.
---
Leveraging strength is powerful; why reinvent the wheel?
---
Basically, it's a multiple-choice question: do you add or subtract? This team is clearly smart.
---
The liquidity part is directly inherited, solving cold start problems instantly—really impressive.
---
Focusing on doing one thing right is correct; just worry about the final product falling short.
---
If the Ethereum L2 ecosystem really succeeds, the bonus period for such projects won't last long.
---
It's foolish to keep messing around after infrastructure matures; this approach is indeed rational.
---
Hey, just want to ask if this tokenization market can finally land?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 6h ago
Playing with L2 should be like this; don't bother with the independent chain approach, it's a waste of time.
A well-known team is advancing L2 solutions on the Ethereum ecosystem, abandoning the route of building independent public chains. The reason is straightforward—focus.
Choosing to build a layer 2 solution based on Ethereum L1 has obvious benefits: firstly, it directly inherits Ethereum's decentralization and security features without starting from scratch; secondly, it can access the large liquidity pools within the existing EVM ecosystem, avoiding the awkwardness of cold start.
The advantage of this approach is that the team can concentrate all their energy on the truly core task—building a tokenized stock market. No dispersion, no waste, focusing wholeheartedly on one thing. In an era where infrastructure is already sufficiently mature, this "leveraging" approach is actually more wise.