2026-01-13 16:38:52

TokenInsight December Rating Monthly Update

Over the past month, we conducted a new round of assessments and rating releases for four key projects. Covering multiple sectors including Layer-1 networks, DeFi ecosystem protocols, decentralized exchanges, and market makers.

Summary of this month's rating results:
Euler Finance ($EUL) - BB level (Stable)
Stable ($STABLE) - BB level (Stable)
AIOZ Network ($AIOZ) - Rating in progress

This rating cycle reflects our comprehensive judgment of these projects' fundamentals, risk factors, and market performance. More detailed rating data and analysis reports are being prepared.

EUL0,68%

STABLE8,69%

AIOZ11,17%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-0717ab66

· 16h ago

It's another BB rating. It feels like TokenInsight's rating this month is a bit conservative... EUL and STABLE are both rated stable. When will AIOZ's results be out? Please hurry. But on the other hand, these monthly updates are still somewhat interesting. It's better than having no reference at all.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 16h ago

BB stable? Come on, I haven't forgotten the flash loan vulnerability in Euler. Adding an extra layer of permission control would be more reassuring. Just relying on ratings without a proper audit checklist feels a bit superficial.

View OriginalReply0

StakeHouseDirector

· 16h ago

Both BB-levels are stable. It seems that TokenInsight is not willing to take big risks this time. EUL and STABLE are both BB? The rating standards seem a bit lenient. If the market continues to fluctuate, these two will also shake. Is AIOZ still under rating? What's going on, is it uncertain or is there some good news coming? Only two projects rated out of four, the efficiency is a bit low haha. BB level = "I am optimistic but not willing to bet heavily," is that what this rating means? Euler has stabilized this time? I thought it was already completely cooled off.

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 16h ago

There are so many BB-level projects, it feels like they're just wasting time. EUL has stabilized but the price hasn't moved? $STABLE, such a name... it's a bit desperate. Is AIOZ still under review? How long will it take? Only two out of four projects have results, the efficiency is a bit concerning.

View OriginalReply0

Degentleman

· 16h ago

Another BB level... Do we have to wait and see again this time? It feels like EUL and STABLE are both stable, no surprises at all. What happened to the AIOZ project? Is the rating still in progress? TokenInsight's rating this month is a bit conservative. Why are they all BB? Isn't there a more aggressive judgment? Let's wait for the detailed report to come out; this summary provides too little information. EUL and STABLE both BB, is there any implication behind this? The rating cycle reflects a comprehensive judgment... but I’d like to hear if there are any black swan risks. Another monthly update, with the market so competitive, who has time to read this? Hey, AIOZ is still being rated, seems like there’s a story behind it.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 16h ago

Wait, are EUL and STABLE both BB stable at the same time? We need to see who is operating behind the scenes and whether the capital flow matches up. The whale wallet is stocking up again; I need to track the address cluster. It feels like the rating data still has gaps to fill. Is "In Progress" waiting for some news? Why is AIOZ still ongoing? Did they discover suspicious interactions? Is BB level really stable? On-chain evidence, please—I want to see the transfer records. The capital flow before and after this rating should be checked—could there be institutions secretly building positions? TokenInsight is trying to shift blame or do they really have research? Details make all the difference. Why are there only three projects? What about the other one? Is the backend data not meant to be public?

View OriginalReply0