Recently, people keep asking: "When will crypto asset trading be allowed in China?" I've heard this question so many times that I might as well spell it out today—it's not that the direction is wrong, it's just that the timing isn't right yet.



To get straight to the point: Don’t get your hopes up in the short term; it’ll take at least another 5 to 8 years. Want to participate in crypto assets compliantly in China? Right now, it’s just not realistic. But if you look at the long term, the shift from "strictly prohibited" to "limited opening" is bound to happen sooner or later. Why? Let’s start with the underlying logic.

Where's the core contradiction? Currently, crypto assets are like a crack in the flood control dike for China’s economy. Domestic assets—like real estate and A-shares—have long been valued higher than similar assets overseas. Maintaining this valuation gap largely depends on cross-border capital controls. Imagine your pool’s water level is higher than your neighbor’s, separated by a wall; if the wall gets a hole, the water will inevitably rush out. Crypto assets are that potential "breach"—decentralized, hard to regulate, capable of cross-border flow—naturally a channel for capital outflow.

Now let’s talk about the current stage. Economist Richard Koo’s “balance sheet recession” theory may sound academic, but it’s actually easy to understand: Over the past decade or so, companies expanded aggressively, individuals leveraged up to buy property, and local governments borrowed heavily for infrastructure, piling up debt to the tipping point. Now? Companies find their profits can’t cover debt costs, individuals see housing prices stagnate while still having to pay mortgages, and local governments have no surplus to start new projects. So everyone is doing the same thing—paying down debt, rather than taking on new debt to invest.

This is the “deleveraging” cycle. Companies aren’t expanding production, households aren’t buying more property, and the whole economy spirals into contraction. At this critical juncture, what would happen if crypto asset trading were opened up? Capital would flow out to overseas markets even faster, domestic asset valuations could crash, and deleveraging would turn into a "hard landing"—the consequences would be unimaginable. So the current strict control policies are essentially "stopping the bleeding"—stabilizing domestic asset prices to get through this downturn.

But what about the long term? Once deleveraging is basically done, asset valuations return to reasonable levels, and cross-border capital flow pressure eases, the "systemic risk" from crypto assets will drop. At that point, regulators might introduce restricted, traceable compliant channels—like specific licenses, real-name trading, quota management, and so on. It won’t be fully open, but it won’t be a blanket ban either.

Why is the timeline 5 to 8 years? Because repairing balance sheets is a slow process—Japan took more than a decade, and with China’s larger economy and more policy tools, even an optimistic estimate puts the cycle at about the same length. So the answer is clear: it’s not never, it’s just not the right time now. Really want to participate? Either wait for the policy window, or use compliant overseas channels. Don’t rush—the wheels of history keep turning, and what’s meant to come will eventually come.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PrivacyMaximalistvip
· 12-12 21:45
5-8 years is too optimistic; I bet on a 10-year timeline to get started. That being said, this logic is basically "wait for the economy to improve," but the problem is no one knows when it will actually improve. Rather than waiting for policies, it's better to go overseas early and learn how to play, to avoid another round of rookie leek-cutting in the future. Japan has been doing it for over ten years; with our larger size, it might take even longer. Calculating it this way is truly discouraging. But on the other hand, do you think there will be many new opportunities for retail investors when the day of opening finally comes? The most realistic thing now is that those who need to set up overseas accounts already have, and those still hesitating will miss out once the opportunity is gone. This kind of "stop-loss theory" sounds convincing, but it's really just a way to say—ordinary people should avoid touching it for now. If people want to move their funds, no one can really stop them; strict policy controls are only delaying the process.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMastervip
· 12-11 18:55
5-8 years? Then I guess I’ll have to wait until I go grey... Forget it, I’d better just play with overseas chains honestly.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 12-11 06:57
5 to 8 years? I bet I’ll have to change the schedule again when the time comes Another economic logic of "should be feasible in theory" with MAX academic value and MIN practical value This wall is even more solid than Lu Ban No.7's fortifications. Want to break through? First fill this smart debt trap Waiting, waiting, we've all waited so long, but I have to admit this analysis is somewhat interesting It's just another useless open promise. I'll try whether to believe this schedule or not
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 12-10 03:18
5 to 8 years? I see it more pessimistically, I'm afraid I have to wait 10 years to start This logic is indeed thorough, but I feel that the author is still a little optimistic. How can the balance sheet be repaired so quickly, Japan has not completely turned over for more than ten years The compliance window is far away, so instead of waiting, it is better to get on the overseas exchange first, don't be foolish to hold on to an illusory hope The surge of something means that the regulators can't let go at all. They will always have to hold the card of capital control So we still have to be prepared for the long term, don't expect to be "limited opening" tomorrow, that is a deceptive story
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarkervip
· 12-10 03:18
so basically the author is saying "not if, when" but the when is like... *gestures vaguely at next decade* - the balance sheet repair speedrun is real and yeah, crypto's literally the leak in the dam they're trying to patch rn
Reply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 12-10 03:15
5 to 8 years? Then don't I have to wait until my hair turns gray Wait, this logic means that the valuation of domestic assets is inflated, and funds will flee if they are afraid of liberalizing crypto? Sounds a bit reasonable, but it's also quite desperate Limited opening is to trap us, and the real-name system quota management is no different from the ban This guy analyzes deeply, but I still want to ask: Will the policy really turn around in 5 years? Or there will be a new reason to continue to ban it Forget it, anyway, I have already participated through overseas channels, so let's just pretend that this part of China has never existed
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 12-10 03:06
5 to 8 years, this number again... Anyway, I can't wait --- The metaphor of the flood control embankment is absolute, that is, we are all trapped in a cage of high valuation --- It's really "stopping the bleeding", then we retail investors are the blood that flows out --- Wait for deleveraging to be completed? How long will it take for brother, my money has been depreciated --- Compliant overseas channels, right, understand, don't want to play in China --- Balance sheet recession... It sounds uncomfortable, no wonder it's so conservative --- 5 to 8 years, people said the same when buying a house, now --- This logic is actually that we can't let money flow out, it's better to make us all uncomfortable --- I'm really a little hopeful compared to the permanent ban... But how to survive these 5 to 8 years --- The price of a hard landing is passed on to us, right, understand
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 12-10 03:05
5 to 8 years? I've seen enough choking, and this is estimated to be doubled Compliance overseas channels have been used for a long time The problem is still the same old problem, and the policy window designation is far away The metaphor of the pool gap is okay, but it is quite uncomfortable for us to be blocked It doesn't mean never open, never open At that time, a bunch of restrictions will not be as high as the current degree of freedom
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAOvip
· 12-10 02:53
5-8 years? Then I'll just keep my money overseas for now.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)