A buy order of $103 can be marked as main funds inflow? And even gives a 60% upside prediction?
Recently, I noticed the main funds monitoring system on a major platform, and the RVN data is quite confusing. If this amount counts as "main funds," by this standard, wouldn't there be thousands of so-called main accounts on the platform?
Honestly, the logic that $103 can move the market... just doesn't seem right. Shouldn't the threshold setting for this monitoring algorithm be recalibrated? After all, for a coin with RVN's market cap, the actual capital needed to impact price action should be much higher than this.
Has anyone used similar features? Are the main funds alerts reliable on your end?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CantAffordPancake
· 1h ago
103 yuan is the main force? Then I am also the main force haha
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 12-10 02:45
You can hype up someone with just 103 bucks as a whale? Is this platform a joke?
---
This threshold is ridiculous, feels like it's just a gimmick.
---
Seriously? A 60% price increase prediction? I seriously doubt how this system is calibrated.
---
With a coin like RVN, what can you possibly do with $103? Anyone can tell it's not reliable at all.
---
The algorithm is so bad, I'd rather just check on-chain wallet flows myself.
---
Thousands of whale accounts? That's just overestimating the retail traders.
---
To be blunt, this system is just a disguise for a retail investor trap.
---
This is so absurd, I'd rather just analyze the charts myself than rely on these alerts.
---
Whales? It's more like the platform is just dressing up their own data.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 12-10 02:43
You call $103 a whale? This platform must be joking, haha.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 12-10 02:35
They're calling $103 a whale? That's hilarious, this platform must think retail traders are whales.
---
This threshold is way too absurd. By this logic, I’m a whale too.
---
Seriously? 60% of the predictions come from $103 orders? Who am I supposed to believe?
---
I've used similar ones. Honestly, I just treat those alerts as a joke.
---
Can $103 really move RVN at this scale? No way, it's definitely just poor algorithm tuning.
---
Feels like these monitoring systems are just tools to fleece newbies—such an obvious flaw and they still haven’t fixed it.
---
I just want to know if anyone actually believes in this so-called whale inflow. Does anyone, really?
---
Calling a $100 order a whale entry? Might as well blame every price move on some random small trade.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 12-10 02:29
Daring to label someone as a whale with just $103? This platform must be joking...
With the algorithm threshold set this low, even I can be a whale, haha.
You really have to question this kind of data—RVN's volume is so small that just over a hundred bucks can't make any waves at all.
A buy order of $103 can be marked as main funds inflow? And even gives a 60% upside prediction?
Recently, I noticed the main funds monitoring system on a major platform, and the RVN data is quite confusing. If this amount counts as "main funds," by this standard, wouldn't there be thousands of so-called main accounts on the platform?
Honestly, the logic that $103 can move the market... just doesn't seem right. Shouldn't the threshold setting for this monitoring algorithm be recalibrated? After all, for a coin with RVN's market cap, the actual capital needed to impact price action should be much higher than this.
Has anyone used similar features? Are the main funds alerts reliable on your end?