The USDe Meltdown Explained: How Leverage and Liquidity Sparked a Systemic Chain Reaction

Event Trigger

A more direct tariff announcement from former U.S. President Trump suddenly ignited long-suppressed volatility in the crypto market. While this statement was only the initial spark, the real catalyst lay in the market’s highly leveraged capital structure and the recursive lending strategy built around the high-yield stablecoin USDe.

Following the news, traditional financial markets experienced sharp turbulence, but the reaction in crypto was even more dramatic: Bitcoin dropped more than 16% in a single day, and select altcoins plunged over 80% within hours. Total market-wide liquidations exceeded $20 billion, and market panic surged. This chain collapse not only exposed the market’s extreme fragility, but also showed how the dangerous balance between yield incentives and leverage had long spun out of control.

USDe and Recursive Lending Leverage

USDe, launched by Ethena Labs, is viewed as a next-generation synthetic dollar. Before the downturn, its market cap had topped $14 billion. USDe does not rely on dollar reserves; instead, it maintains stability through delta-neutral hedging (holding ETH spot positions while shorting an equal amount of Perpetual Contracts). In an intensely competitive stablecoin market, USDe offers APYs of 12%–15%, making it a prime target for capital chasing returns. The real draw, however, is not its mechanism itself but the recursive lending strategy it enables:

1. Collateralize USDe to borrow USDC;
2. Convert the borrowed USDC back into USDe;
3. Repeat the collateralization process four or five times;
4. Ultimately, leverage the same principal into roughly 3.6 times the original position.

This structure appears efficient for yield, but is extremely hazardous in terms of risk. If USDe’s price declines by just 20%–25%, the entire position can be liquidated, leading to asset mismatches and collateral misrepresentation within the system.

Dual-Layer Risk of High Leverage Strategies

Whales holding significant amounts of altcoins amplified the crisis. Seeking maximum capital efficiency, they typically:

• First layer of leverage: use altcoins as collateral to borrow stablecoins;
• Second layer of leverage: deploy stablecoins into the USDe recursive lending strategy.

This double-layered structure multiplies potential risks. When Trump’s tariff post triggered the initial decline, whales saw their collateral values drop sharply, setting off LTV thresholds and margin calls. To cover their positions, they had to sell stablecoins or unwind their USDe lending. This caused heavy sell pressure on USDe against USDC/USDT. The result was a breakdown in liquidity and depegging, which then triggered on-chain automated liquidations. This further destabilized the market structure.

Market Maker Crisis

Market makers (MMs), typically stabilizers, became accelerants of the collapse in this episode. In pursuit of capital efficiency, most market makers use unified account structures, treating all assets as shared margin. When the value of collateral altcoins plunged, total account value contracted instantly, passive leverage spiked, and liquidation mechanisms activated. Exchange risk systems do not distinguish asset type during liquidation, so all tokens in an account—including highly liquid mainstream assets—are sold simultaneously. To protect themselves, market makers closed buy orders and withdrew liquidity, creating an extreme liquidity vacuum. When sell-offs occur in this environment, prices crash to just 10%–20% of their starting value within minutes.

If you want to learn more about Web3, please register at: https://www.gate.com/

Summary

This event reminds all crypto participants that high yield is not without risk—it represents the hidden premium markets charge. When the boundaries between DeFi and CeFi blur, and collateral assets span multiple financial layers, even a minor external shock can set off a chain reaction of structural failure.