MrDarkHorse

$RAVE Review - The market maker's harvesting logic is correct
Short entered at 0.6671, now at 0.6238, floating profit of 6.5 points. This logic is correct, with 75% retail investors going long + funding rate of 0.0831%, the market maker's harvesting signal is clear
Now the funding rate trend has turned positive, the bears are wiped out, and it’s highly likely to continue falling. Open interest continues to decrease by 1.6%, longs are fleeing, and there’s no problem with the shorting direction. This market condition is just the market maker grinding the longs, if retail investors don’t exi

$KNC Review - The trap of pumping volume to make the list
Bought in at 0.1685, now at 0.1558, a loss of 7.5 points. What's more painful is that it once reached 0.1897, with an unrealized profit of 12 points, and I didn't sell. Now it has turned into a loss, this is the consequence of lacking execution
At that time, I saw the funding rate -1.1309%, and the short position was bleeding heavily, with a turnover rate of 31 times, thinking that the big players were building positions. But I was wrong; a turnover rate of 31 times is not building positions, it's pumping volume to buy ad space to make

$ENSO Review - Funding Rate Trap
Bought in at 0.988, now at 0.9773, losing 1 point. The most painful part is that it once reached 1.0932, with an unrealized profit of 10 points, but I didn't sell, now it turns into a loss. That’s the cost of greed.
At that time, I saw the funding rate at -0.1975%, short sellers were paying money, thinking it was a short squeeze structure. But I overlooked a critical issue: open interest (OI) had been flat, and the funding rate narrowed from -0.1975% to -0.0031%. This isn’t a short squeeze; both longs and shorts were withdrawing. The real short squeeze occ

Today’s gainers list is lively, but if you ask me whether I dare to chase, I’ll tell you most of them I don’t touch
$1000000BOB increased by 77.8%, open interest surged by 127.7%, turnover rate 11.3 times, this is a typical pump-and-dump coin manipulated by the whales. The holding value is rising faster than the price, whales are frantically spoofing volume and buying ad spots, the long-short ratio is 79/21, retail investors are piled up on longs, funding rate is an outrageous 0.19%, chasing high in this market is just giving money to the whales
$TST increased by 45.2%, turnover rate 14.3

A double kill, one long and one short, both in profit, telling everyone but you didn't catch up—can you handle that?
$KNC Entered long at 0.1685, now at 0.1771, floating profit of 5.1%. At that time, the funding rate was -1.1309%, shorts bleeding heavily every 8 hours, turnover rate of 31 times, the market maker is pushing volume to make the list—this market pattern clearly aims to squeeze the shorts.
$RAVE Entered short at 0.6671, now at 0.6346, floating profit of 4.9%. Retail investors are 75% long, funding rate is 0.0831%, longs are paying, the market maker's signal of harvesting is clear

$KNC 0.1685 going in more! Whether you follow or not, I have confidence when I place orders 🔥
Funding rate -1.1309%, tell me who can withstand this kind of bleeding?
Turnover rate is 31 times, trading volume is 31 times the open interest, clearly the market maker is boosting the volume to make the list. Open interest value is 4.2M U, someone is positioning at this level, and the amount being positioned is not small.
The current price has increased by 22.3%, you can enter directly, or wait for a 5% pullback to enter more safely. Stop loss at 0.14382, giving 15% space, considering the levels a

$AXL 0.06686 entered a lot, with precise take-profit at 0.075, capturing a 12.3% increase, and a 24-hour return of 249% realized.
Brothers secretly following my signals simply can't spend it all!
On the evening of May 1st, I looked at the data and felt someone was quietly building a position. At 0.6686, I told everyone I had to buy this long, originally considering 0.082, but later found that fees had decreased and market sentiment cooled, so I immediately moved the stop-loss and set the take-profit at 0.075.
Took profit after one day and walked away; after taking profit, it surged a bit more,

Refuse $XAU EA starts with me!
There are all kinds of EAs on the market
Profit of 40% in the first 15 days, nearly $4,000
Initially floating loss of $300 on the evening of the 29th, then on the 30th, floating loss reached $8,000
When a strong trending market comes, it’s quickly taken out
#WCTC交易王PK

$AXL Both long positions on $ENSO and #WCTC交易王PK are floating at a loss. I straightforwardly said the logic is correct, just that I wanted to make too much profit.
AXL is currently priced at 0.06592, down more than 3%, yesterday it reached a high of 0.071 with a floating profit of over 6.66%, but it was pushed back again. Where is the problem? Open interest (OI) went from +19% at the time of the signal to -8%, and the position is decreasing, indicating that the bulls are fleeing. I was looking at the surge in OI + short positions paying to enter, thinking the market maker was building a pos

Why did we just choose $AXL to go long instead of other “meme” coins?
The signal is the strongest (OI+117%, fee rate -0.36%), but it has already risen by 50%, and the stop-loss distance is not sufficient if you chase in—so the risk is not symmetrical.
$ENSO already opened a long position yesterday, so we don’t repeat it.
$META has a short signal. Retail investors are 71% long. The logic is valid, but the direction is the opposite—sent separately.
$MON has the weakest signal and the lowest score.
$AXL is up only +13%, OI is still growing, the funding rate remains deeply negative, and the e

$AXL Shorts are losing money, I have to enter this long position.
Funding rate -0.1719%, shorts are paying out money every 8 hours, enduring until they can't hold on anymore.
This negative funding rate isn't a matter of a few hours; when the deep negative persists, the short positions' costs will force them out, and short squeeze happens this way.
Entered at 0.06686, set stop loss at 0.056891, target first at 0.082, if it goes smoothly then look at 0.089.
Don't over-leverage your position, keep some bullets; a real drop could be an opportunity to add.

Real-time order calls review, entry points, take profit, and stop-loss levels are clear and verifiable, no empty talk or ambiguity!
$ORCA entered at 1.601, today took profit at 2.019 successfully, gaining a 26.1% increase, with a return of 678%!
On the 28th, I called for a long at 1.6, and on the 30th, I called another wave at 1.67. If you didn't get on board, that's not my fault!
The logic is a short squeeze structure combined with an extremely negative funding rate, where shorts are paying to hold their positions. I've seen this structure many times before, so the direction won't be w

Yesterday $MEGA hit the stop loss, -10.57%, nothing much to say.
Bought in at 0.17098, stop loss set at 0.1529, the logic was fading popularity + on-chain selling, the direction was correct, but I didn't expect it to fall more sharply than I anticipated, dropping straight to 0.14291, taking my stop loss out.
Looking back, the problem was the timing of the entry, that position hadn't fully confirmed the end of the selling yet, I entered too early, should have waited for a clearer failed rebound signal before entering, I was too impatient.
The direction was correct, execution was the issu

Don't hesitate to go long on $ENSO ! Do it right now! Go long!
If we're good brothers, let's go long on $ENSO at 0.95!
We all have a bright future!
#WCTC交易王PK

Instead of gambling recklessly on knockoff coins, why not come and reason with me!
$ENSO The short squeeze structure has already been established, and the shorts are now losing money by holding their positions.
Funding rate -0.3319%, Open Interest has increased by 15.1%, when you see these two data points together, tell me who is building the position? Retail investors can't create such movements. Shorts are bleeding every hour, the longer it lasts, the more uncomfortable it becomes, clearly a squeeze is being forced.
The long-to-short ratio is 53.5%, with longs in the lead, which isn't extre

$ORCA 1.67 this position can enter more positions!
I still hold my position above 1.6, the data is here.
Long/short ratio 53/47, it doesn't look too extreme, but the funding rate is -0.0906%, shorts are paying longs, losing money every hour. Tell me, how long can shorts hold on?
Open interest increased by 15.5%, this isn't retail traders messing around, there are big funds laying out here, and the market isn't chaotic, it's moving steadily.
I've already gone long myself, stop loss set at 1.459, this position isn't at an integer level, can't scan for pin insertion. The first target is 1.956, t

Yesterday's two trades review, the data speaks for itself, simply and directly crushing your teacher!
$ZKJ ：[Stop Loss] -39.6%. Dropped to a low of 0.014, stopped out (actually called for a short, but I didn't dare short Yao coin). When calling the trade, the price was 0.0496, advised to wait for a pullback to 0.0283 before entering. Those who chased high were stopped out, those who waited for a pullback took profit +35%.
$MOVE ：Unrealized loss -2.2%, the logic didn't break, continue to wait. Sideways consolidation signal.
Summary: 2 trades, 0% win rate, average profit/loss -20.9%. Not ideal

The order is finished, let's talk about whether $API3 has skill—judge for yourself!
Yesterday, I entered at 0.3570, and woke up today to take profit at 0.4181, a 346% return.
The original signal clearly stated: Open interest surged by 28.9%, funding rate was -0.4251%, shorts were losing 0.4% per hour, and the long-short ratio favored shorts, yet the price was rising—this is a classic short squeeze structure.
Who is the market maker trying to harvest? It’s those retail traders who are 51.5% short.
I don’t aim for a hundredfold gain, just to earn within my understanding. If the structure is rig