Lately, I've been hearing people talk about "modularization" a lot, and at first, I found it a bit annoying: how does this really relate to ordinary users? After thinking about it, honestly, what you're feeling isn't just the concept, but the experience — with the same transfers/interactions, the chain is less likely to get congested, transaction fees won't fluctuate wildly from sky-high to low, and confirmations are more stable; also, applications can iterate faster, you can use them on chain A today and move to chain B tomorrow, smoothly transferring your account assets, avoiding the pitfall of "switching chains and starting over." (Don’t ask, I’m still haunted by the shadow of bridges being hacked.)

But on the other hand, reality is: once you break down the modules, there are more steps, and more points where problems can occur, especially if you don’t look at on-chain data, you simply don’t know whether you're relying on "main chain security" or "outsourced security." Recently, some regions have been tightening taxes and compliance, then loosening again, causing deposit and withdrawal expectations to shift, and on-chain leverage fluctuates with water being pumped in or drained out, giving the feeling of “why suddenly it’s congested and expensive again / or smooth sailing.” So I’m more concerned about the subtle deformations before the explosion: whether liquidity and leverage are quietly stacking up. Let’s watch and see gradually.