Bitcoin drops below $65,000, and many people's first reaction is "trend turning bearish." But if you look at it over a longer period, this is more like a correction of inertia optimism. Previously, many funds were accustomed to rebounds after dips, forming a path dependence—buying on every decline. But the market won't always reward the same behavior; when bottom-fishing becomes a consensus, it will itself become ineffective. The significance of key levels often lies more in the psychological realm. Whole-number thresholds act as emotional anchors. Once broken, stop-losses and quantitative sell orders are easily triggered, causing short-term panic selling. But this doesn't automatically mean a long-term trend reversal; it's a process of emotions shifting from "greed" back to "caution." What’s worth noting is the structure of the decline: if there's a sharp drop with high volume, it indicates rapid chip turnover; if it’s a volume-contracted, downward move, it’s more like a mood of waiting and watching. The real danger isn’t breaking a certain price level, but the sudden disappearance of liquidity. History has shown multiple times that deep corrections in a bull market are often accompanied by 20%-30% volatility. For high-volatility assets, pullbacks are normal, not exceptions. Mistaking normal fluctuations for a trend ending often leads to capitulation at low levels. In one sentence: Falling below a key level isn’t scary; what’s scary is replacing strategy with emotion.
[The user has shared his/her trading data. Go to the App to view more.]
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The market is squeezing out "inertia optimism"
Bitcoin drops below $65,000, and many people's first reaction is "trend turning bearish." But if you look at it over a longer period, this is more like a correction of inertia optimism. Previously, many funds were accustomed to rebounds after dips, forming a path dependence—buying on every decline. But the market won't always reward the same behavior; when bottom-fishing becomes a consensus, it will itself become ineffective.
The significance of key levels often lies more in the psychological realm. Whole-number thresholds act as emotional anchors. Once broken, stop-losses and quantitative sell orders are easily triggered, causing short-term panic selling. But this doesn't automatically mean a long-term trend reversal; it's a process of emotions shifting from "greed" back to "caution."
What’s worth noting is the structure of the decline: if there's a sharp drop with high volume, it indicates rapid chip turnover; if it’s a volume-contracted, downward move, it’s more like a mood of waiting and watching. The real danger isn’t breaking a certain price level, but the sudden disappearance of liquidity.
History has shown multiple times that deep corrections in a bull market are often accompanied by 20%-30% volatility. For high-volatility assets, pullbacks are normal, not exceptions. Mistaking normal fluctuations for a trend ending often leads to capitulation at low levels.
In one sentence: Falling below a key level isn’t scary; what’s scary is replacing strategy with emotion.