Don't rush to draw conclusions. There's a piece of data worth looking at — according to Token Terminal's statistics, Starknet's total number of transactions over the past three years has reached 265 million (summed weekly). How can this be called "10 transactions per day" with that scale?
Of course, you can discuss the quality of these transactions, user stickiness, and other related issues; these are meaningful topics. But to say "completely zeroed out"? That seems a bit too hasty. The data is there, and Starknet's on-chain activity at least indicates that the project is still operational. How far it can go is another question.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBro
· 8h ago
Ha, 265 million transactions and only 10 per day on average? That statement is just too funny.
People always love to make up stories; the data is right there, don't rush to dismiss it.
Quality issues are one thing, but at least you have to admit they're still alive.
The "reset to zero" theory is really out there; it's hard to argue with the data.
Activity levels are right here; if you're going to tell a story, it should be a complete one, right?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 8h ago
265 million transactions—it's really unreasonable to say they're inactive. Those calling for zero haven't looked at the data.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 8h ago
265 million transactions, this data indeed refutes the claim of an average of 10 transactions per day.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 9h ago
265 million transactions sound impressive, but how many actually go viral? Quality is king, bro. I was also fooled by this kind of data before... a costly lesson.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 9h ago
265 million transactions are right there, so it's really not easy to directly impose the death penalty.
Don't rush to draw conclusions. There's a piece of data worth looking at — according to Token Terminal's statistics, Starknet's total number of transactions over the past three years has reached 265 million (summed weekly). How can this be called "10 transactions per day" with that scale?
Of course, you can discuss the quality of these transactions, user stickiness, and other related issues; these are meaningful topics. But to say "completely zeroed out"? That seems a bit too hasty. The data is there, and Starknet's on-chain activity at least indicates that the project is still operational. How far it can go is another question.