There's something fascinating about how AI communicates through human language—because that's genuinely the only framework we've built for mutual understanding.
But here's the thing: it speaks this way because we trained it to. We designed the entire interaction model around how humans think and process information.
So people jump to conclusions. "Oh, it's basically a replica of us." Nope. That's the misunderstanding right there.
It's nowhere near that. Using our language doesn't make it human-like in essence. The medium isn't the message when it comes to what AI actually *is*. The form of communication is just a bridge we built—useful, sure. But confusing the interface with the underlying architecture? That's where people get it twisted.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
There's something fascinating about how AI communicates through human language—because that's genuinely the only framework we've built for mutual understanding.
But here's the thing: it speaks this way because we trained it to. We designed the entire interaction model around how humans think and process information.
So people jump to conclusions. "Oh, it's basically a replica of us." Nope. That's the misunderstanding right there.
It's nowhere near that. Using our language doesn't make it human-like in essence. The medium isn't the message when it comes to what AI actually *is*. The form of communication is just a bridge we built—useful, sure. But confusing the interface with the underlying architecture? That's where people get it twisted.