1. Background of the Pectra Hard Fork

Image Source: Coinpedia

The Ethereum Pectra upgrade went live on March 5, combining the Prague and Electra updates to enhance both Ethereum’s execution layer and consensus layer. The Pectra hard fork marks a major milestone in Ethereum’s evolution, aimed at improving ETH staking, boosting Layer 2 (L2) scalability, and expanding network capacity by introducing 11 Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs). The upgrade process was first implemented on the Holesky testnet on February 24, 2024, and is scheduled to be deployed to the Ethereum mainnet on April 8, 2024, contingent on the successful completion of upgrades on both the Holesky and Sepolia testnets.

Following the Dencun upgrade in March 2024, Pectra is expected to integrate multiple Ethereum Improvement Proposals to tackle scalability, security, and user experience challenges, according to ethereum.org (see reference 1). The upgrade is divided into two phases:

Phase 1: Mid-March 2025

• Doubling L2 Blob Capacity: Expands blob capacity per block from 3 to 6, reducing congestion and lowering fees.
• Account Abstraction: Enables users to pay gas fees with stablecoins like USDC and DAI, improving payment flexibility.
• Validator Staking Cap Increase: Raises the staking cap from 32 ETH to 2,048 ETH, allowing large-scale staking operations.

Phase 2: Late 2025 — Early 2026

• Implementation of Verkle Trees: Replaces Merkle-Patricia trees with a more efficient data structure, improving data storage and synchronization.
• Peer Data Availability Sampling (PeerDAS): Enables nodes to validate transaction data without storing all of it, enhancing scalability.

2. Key Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) in the Pectra Upgrade

Image Source: Datawallet

The Pectra upgrade includes 11 Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs), designed to enhance scalability, security, account abstraction, and validator staking mechanisms. The following highlights key proposals based on their potential impact on Ethereum’s development (subject to individual research perspectives):

1. EIP-7702: Account Abstraction

• Overview: Allows externally owned accounts (EOAs) to execute some smart contract functionalities, enabling batch transactions and gas fee sponsorship.
• Opinion: This will significantly enhance account abstraction wallets, allowing them to function like smart contracts — handling batch transactions and enabling third-party gas payments. (Related EIP-7840 extends account functionalities further, enabling customizable account behaviors).

2. EIP-7251: Validator Staking Increase

• Overview: Raises the maximum validator stake from 32 ETH to 2,048 ETH, simplifying validator management and allowing larger-scale staking nodes.
• Opinion: While this increases Ethereum’s staking centralization, it also raises the barrier to entry for validators, making the staking process more suited to institutions rather than retail participants.

3. EIP-7002: Withdrawal Improvements

• Overview: Enables execution layer addresses to trigger withdrawals, reducing dependency on the consensus layer and simplifying the withdrawal process.
• Opinion: Makes withdrawals more direct and efficient, eliminating unnecessary steps in the staking withdrawal process.

4. EIP-6110: Validator Activation Delay Optimization

• Overview: Reduces validator activation delay from ~9 hours to ~13 minutes, significantly improving network participation efficiency.
• Opinion: Faster validator onboarding enhances Ethereum’s resource efficiency and reduces network congestion, lowering operational costs.

5. EIP-7691: Block Size Expansion

• Overview: Increases block size by 50%, enabling the network to process more transactions and improve overall scalability.
• Opinion: Reducing congestion and improving transaction speeds will help Ethereum handle higher traffic, particularly during peak usage. (Related EIP-7742 dynamically adjusts blob capacity per block to further optimize L2 scaling).

6. EIP-7516: Enhancing MEV Transparency

• Overview: Provides more visibility into Maximum Extractable Value (MEV), helping users and developers better understand and monitor MEV activities.
• Opinion: While increasing transparency reduces arbitrage opportunities, it enhances fairness in Ethereum transactions.

7. EIP-7549: Gas Fee Adjustment

• Overview: Optimizes gas fee structure to reduce congestion and stabilize transaction costs.
• Opinion: Helps mitigate spikes in gas fees during network congestion, making fees more predictable. (EIP-6046 also adjusts gas fees, but EIP-7549 introduces a more dynamic and flexible pricing mechanism).

8. EIP-7685: Governance Mechanism Optimization

• Overview: Improves Ethereum’s governance structure, making it more decentralized, transparent, and efficient.
• Opinion: Could accelerate proposal approvals and improve community-driven decision-making.

9. EIP-7021: Validator Penalty Mechanism Improvement

• Overview: Adjusts penalty mechanisms to better align validator incentives with network security and minimize malicious behavior.
• Opinion: Serves as a counterbalance to the increased validator staking limit (EIP-7251), ensuring fair play among validators.

10. EIP-7683: Smart Contract Performance Optimization

• Overview: Improves gas efficiency for smart contract execution, lowering execution costs and boosting on-chain efficiency.
• Opinion: This will benefit DeFi applications, reducing costs and enhancing transaction speed — potentially optimizing Uniswap’s trading mechanisms.

11. EIP-6123: Cross-Chain Compatibility Improvement

• Overview: Enhances Ethereum’s interoperability with other blockchains, promoting seamless cross-chain operations.
• Opinion: Strengthens Ethereum’s role as a multi-chain hub, making asset transfers and interactions across chains smoother.

3. Pectra’s Dual-Layer Upgrade

Image Source: Cryptoticker

Pectra adopts a dual-layer upgrade approach, merging the execution layer (Prague) and the consensus layer (Electra) to resolve synchronization issues that could arise from separate upgrades. Historically, Ethereum’s execution and consensus layers have been upgraded independently due to their distinct functions:

• Execution Layer (Prague): Responsible for processing user transactions, executing smart contracts, and managing state changes. This is the layer where users directly interact with Ethereum, and it serves as the core infrastructure for decentralized applications (DApps) and smart contracts.
• Consensus Layer (Electra): Operates under the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, managing validators, ensuring block production, and maintaining network security. This layer ensures blockchain consistency and integrity, with validators staking assets to align their interests with the network’s security.

Notable EIPs Requiring Layer Modifications

Several EIPs in the Pectra upgrade necessitate modifications to either the execution or consensus layers:

EIPs modifying the consensus layer:

• EIP-6110, EIP-7002, EIP-7251, EIP-7549, EIP-7685, EIP-7691

EIPs modifying the execution layer:

• EIP-2537, EIP-2935, EIP-6110, EIP-7002, EIP-7623, EIP-7685, EIP-7702, EIP-7840

Additional Key EIPs in Pectra

EIP-7623: Cross-Chain Messaging Mechanism Enhancement

• Overview: Improves cross-chain message processing, enhancing the efficiency and security of cross-chain communication.
• Significance: While Pectra primarily focuses on Ethereum’s internal execution and consensus layers, EIP-7623 is designed to optimize interoperability with external blockchains, particularly in cross-chain asset transfers and data transmission.

EIP-2537: BLS12–381 Curve Operations

• Overview: Introduces support for the BLS12–381 cryptographic curve, crucial for zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) and encryption.
• Significance: Unlike Pectra’s broader focus on transaction processing, gas fee optimization, and validator mechanics, EIP-2537 specifically enhances cryptographic capabilities, particularly in privacy-focused applications and proof verification.

EIP-2935: Validator Recovery Mechanism

• Overview: Provides a more flexible mechanism for validators to regain their status after losing their validator role.
• Significance: EIP-2935 ensures validators can reintegrate into the consensus process under certain conditions. In contrast, Pectra’s EIP-7251 and EIP-7021 focus on staking limit adjustments and penalty mechanisms, refining validator incentives and security measures.

4. The Impact of Pectra on Ethereum and the Crypto Market

Image Source: Voice of Crypto

DApps

The Pectra hard fork introduces smart contract functionalities to regular wallets, simplifying the development process and expanding potential applications. Features such as social recovery and batch transactions make it easier to create user-friendly DApps, enhancing the reliability and efficiency of decentralized applications across DeFi, GameFi, and other sectors.

However, Ethereum faces a growing challenge with Layer 2 (L2) “parasitic” effects. L2 chains have absorbed a significant portion of DeFi activity, leading to a decline in mainnet transaction fees and a rise in ETH’s inflation rate. While L2s are part of the Ethereum ecosystem, their centralized sequencers and independent economic models raise concerns about Ethereum’s long-term value proposition.

Ethereum’s Long-Term Value

Many Ethereum holders have expressed frustration over ETH’s price performance in this cycle, with some looking to Pectra as a potential game-changer, particularly in staking improvements and L2 scalability. The upgrade introduces several key enhancements:

• More flexible wallet operations, enabling batch transactions and sponsored gas fees
• Higher validator staking limits, allowing faster withdrawals and validator onboarding
• Increased block capacity, leading to faster transaction processing and more stable gas fees

The higher staking threshold improves MEV transparency, raises MEV costs, and enhances network governance transparency and efficiency. Smart contract execution becomes cheaper, cross-chain compatibility is enhanced, and transaction processing becomes more cost-effective.

However, Ethereum’s fragmentation issue remains unresolved. The ecosystem faces a fundamental question: Should Ethereum aim for a high-throughput single-chain model, or continue relying on fragmented L2 aggregation? This dilemma could become a long-term constraint on Ethereum’s development.

The Solana Factor

Solana’s price surge is primarily driven by high throughput, low transaction costs, and strong U.S. capital backing. Unlike Ethereum’s fragmented liquidity across L2s, Solana’s monolithic liquidity model keeps assets unified within a single network. Ethereum has successfully addressed scalability through L2 solutions but at the cost of innovation fragmentation and replication, making the monolithic chain model increasingly appealing.

From a market perspective, Ethereum’s biggest advantage remains its dominance in decentralized finance (DeFi) — the core value driver of the Ethereum ecosystem.

A Compromise on Decentralization

The biggest advantage of the Pectra upgrade is its improved security and scalability, but EIP-7251 introduces a double-edged sword:

• Pros: Consolidates validator numbers, reducing the burden on large-scale storage and decreasing network operational overhead.
• Cons: Increases centralization, making Ethereum more favorable to large investors and institutions, potentially alienating retail participants.

The strategic question now is whether Ethereum can leverage the 2,048 ETH staking cap to attract institutional capital, similar to Solana and Sui’s appeal to U.S. investors. Can Ethereum’s price be driven higher by embracing institutional money at the cost of decentralization?

Ethereum now faces a new version of the “impossible trinity”:

• Narrative strength
• Centralized price control
• Decentralized PoS staking

Finding the right balance among these elements will be Ethereum’s biggest challenge moving forward.

Where Is Ethereum’s North Star?

Ethereum appears to be losing its direction. The fragmented ETH supply is gradually inflating, and DeFi activity has shifted to L2 chains, causing a sharp decline in mainnet fee capture. In reality, L2 chains function as independent blockchains, with centralized sequencers effectively operating as separate ecosystems.

• Base’s revenue flows to Coinbase
• Arbitrum’s profits flow to Arbitrum DAO
• Ethereum mainnet fails to capture this value

Meanwhile, other blockchains have clear narratives:

• Bitcoin = Digital Gold
• Solana = On-Chain Nasdaq
• AI Adoption = The Next Frontier

Solana’s DeFAI and AI Agent narratives have propelled SOL/ETH ratio gains, fulfilling its vision as Ethereum’s strongest competitor. Metis has repositioned itself as an AI-centric blockchain, competing with DeFAI for the intent-driven ecosystem.

So, what is Ethereum’s North Star?

Ethereum’s ETF applications continue to struggle, primarily due to two key issues:

1.Lack of Staking Yield

• Unlike BTC ETFs, Ethereum ETFs do not offer staking rewards.
• Holding ETH through an ETF misses out on ~3.5% APY staking rewards.
• Investors also incur management fees and cannot access DeFi yield opportunities.

2.Lack of Institutional Alignment

• Ethereum’s strong decentralization makes it difficult for Wall Street to dominate.
• Unlike Bitcoin, Ethereum’s core value has not been fully captured by traditional finance.
• Institutional players primarily engage with Ethereum through stablecoins and DeFi, not direct ETH exposure.

However, Pectra’s 2,048 ETH staking cap signals a potential shift. By allowing larger institutional stakes, Ethereum may align itself with institutional capital through RWA integration, potentially making Ethereum staking ETFs as strategically important as Bitcoin’s reserve adoption.

Ethereum’s short-term North Star might be staking-based ETFs, elevating ETH’s price narrative to the level of Bitcoin’s strategic reserve status.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is reprinted from [YBB Capital]. All copyrights belong to the original author [Ac-Core]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
2. Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
3. The Gate Learn team does translations of the article into other languages. Copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited unless mentioned.