Where to Maximize Returns on Your Staked SOL?

Intermediate3/28/2025, 9:01:07 AM
As the Solana ecosystem grows, more investors are exploring ways to maximize their earned SOL. Whether through official staking or participation in various DeFi projects, investors can enhance network security and liquidity while earning competitive returns. However, each approach has unique characteristics and potential risks, including yield fluctuations, liquidity constraints on staked assets, and smart contract vulnerabilities. This article explores Solana’s official staking, Kraken, Lido, Serum, Raydium, Tulip Protocol, and other leading platforms, and details their requirements, yields, staking pools, yield cycles, advantages, and disadvantages.

1. Solana Official Staking

Platform: Solana Network
Yield: Annual returns range from 6% to 8%, depending on the performance of the chosen validator.
Applicable Pools: No need to select specific pools; staking is done directly through a Solana wallet.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are automatically distributed every two epochs (approximately every two days).

Advantages:

  • Simple and secure staking process, ideal for long-term holders.
  • No reliance on third-party platforms, ensuring high transparency through the official wallet.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited liquidity; unstaking SOL requires a waiting period.
  • Validator performance can impact rewards.

2. Gate Exchange

Platform: Gate Exchange
Yield: Annual returns range from 6% to 8%.
Applicable Pools: Validator selection is automated based on platform strategy. It requires no manual selection.

Advantages:

  • Easy to use and reliable, ideal for users unfamiliar with technical aspects.
  • No minimum staking requirement, accessible to investors of all sizes.

Disadvantages:

  • A centralized platform where users do not fully control their staked assets, which poses platform risk.
  • Limited staking flexibility; withdrawals may have restrictions.

Security Measures:

  • Insurance funds and risk reserves to mitigate potential security incidents.
  • Strict KYC and AML policies ensure a secure trading environment.
  • Regular security testing and third-party audits to identify and fix vulnerabilities.

3. Lido

Platform: Lido (Cross-Chain Staking Platform)
Yield: Annual return of approximately 7%.
Applicable Pools: Lido offers SOL staking and issues stSOL tokens, which can be used in DeFi protocols.
Yield Cycle: stSOL tokens are immediately available for use in other DeFi platforms, which ensures high liquidity.

Advantages:

  • Holding stSOL allows users to earn additional yields on other DeFi platforms.
  • High flexibility, suitable for investors requiring liquidity.

Disadvantages:

  • Apart from staking rewards, DeFi platforms carry risks such as smart contract vulnerabilities and liquidity issues.
  • The value of stSOL may fluctuate significantly in volatile markets.

Security:

  • Lido consistently ranks high in TVL across multiple chains, particularly Ethereum.
  • Operates a decentralized validator selection model to mitigate risks and ensure stable staking rewards.

4. Serum

Platform: Decentralized Exchange (DEX)
Yield: Annual returns range from 10% to 30%, depending on trading volume and liquidity.
Applicable Pools: Users can provide SOL and other tokens (e.g., USDT, USDC, ETH) to liquidity pools and earn rewards.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are updated in real time and adjusted dynamically based on trading volume and liquidity.

Advantages:

  • Provides liquidity on a decentralized platform, which avoids centralized restrictions.
  • Fast transactions due to Solana’s high throughput; liquidity providers can earn more fees.

Disadvantages:

  • Returns may be unstable due to fluctuations in trading volume.
  • Token price volatility can impact pool earnings.

Security:

  • Serum has strong TVL performance and strict liquidity management within the Solana ecosystem.
  • Operates under a fully decentralized trading mechanism, with multiple third-party audits.
  • Features an on-chain order book and transparent liquidity pool management to mitigate risks and protect user funds.

5. Raydium

Platform: AMM (Automated Market Maker) & Liquidity Pools
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 10% to 25%, largely dependent on liquidity and trading volume.
Applicable Pools: Users must provide at least two tokens (e.g., SOL/USDT, SOL/USDC) for staking.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed in real-time through Raydium’s liquidity pools.

Advantages:

  • Offers high APY; suitable for users with liquid assets.
  • Low transaction fees are low, and the Solana ecosystem offers fast transaction speeds and strong liquidity.

Disadvantages:

  • Prone to slippage risk during market volatility.
  • Insufficient liquidity or low trading volume may impact returns.

Security:

  • Raydium operates a stable AMM platform on Solana with consistent TVL performance.
  • The platform uses an automated market-making mechanism combined with rigorous security audits and risk management measures.
  • Assets are fully protected during transactions by diversifying liquidity pool risks.

6. Tulip Protocol

Platform: Lending Protocol
Staking Requirements:
Tulip is a lending protocol on Solana that allows users to deposit SOL and other assets (e.g., USDC, USDT) to earn interest. Unlike traditional staking, users do not need to interact with other stakers but instead deposit assets into Tulip to receive rewards.
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 6% to 15%, depending on the asset type and market demand.
Yield Cycle: Interest is distributed daily or monthly based on market conditions.

Advantages:

  • No need for peer-to-peer staking; users can earn passive income simply by depositing assets.
  • Provides stable interest income, ideal for long-term investors.
  • Simple and user-friendly staking process.

Disadvantages:

  • Lending risks: Since the Tulip protocol relies on the lending market, if borrowers fail to repay loans, deposited assets may be at risk.
  • Smart contract risks: The Tulip protocol depends on smart contracts, which carry inherent technical risks. Vulnerabilities or attacks on the smart contracts could lead to asset loss.

7. Orca (SOL/USDC Whirlpool)

Platform: AMM & Liquidity Pools
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 8% to 15%; suitable for low-slippage concentrated liquidity pools.
Applicable Pools: Provides liquidity for pairs like SOL/USDC.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed in real-time and can be monitored at any time.

Advantages:

  • Supports custom price ranges, which makes it suitable for active liquidity management.
  • Low-slippage trading, ideal for stablecoin swaps.

Disadvantages:

  • Requires strong liquidity management skills, which makes it less suitable for beginners.
  • Liquidity risks remain, especially during high market volatility.

8. Mango Markets

Platform: Decentralized Trading & Lending
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 8% to 20%, depending on liquidity provision.
Applicable Pools: Users can earn rewards by providing liquidity for assets like SOL, USDT, and USDC.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are generated from trading fees and interest from lending markets, and are available at any time.

Advantages:

  • Offers leverage trading, which potentially amplifies returns.
  • Fully decentralized, it allows users to fully control their assets.

Disadvantages:

  • Leverage trading carries high risks, especially during volatile market conditions.
  • Low liquidity may impact expected returns.

Security:

  • As a decentralized trading and lending platform within the Solana ecosystem, Mango Markets maintains a strong TVL and risk control strategy. It employs distributed governance, multiple security audits, and risk mitigation mechanisms to safeguard funds during leverage trading and lending activities.

9. Saber

Platform: Focus on stablecoin liquidity pools
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 5% to 15%, influenced by liquidity and trading volume.
Applicable Pools: Primarily stablecoin pools (e.g., USDC, USDT).
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed through trading fees and liquidity mining, and are updated in real-time.

Advantages:

  • Stable returns, suitable for low-risk investors.
  • Provides a reliable yield source for long-term holders.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited earnings potential if liquidity is insufficient.
  • Market fluctuations may still affect overall yield, despite relative stability.

10. Marinade Finance (mSOL)

Platform: Solana Staking
Yield: Base yield around 7%-8%, with additional DeFi yields (+10%-15%) through mSOL/USDC LP staking.
Applicable Pools: mSOL can be used in liquidity pools, particularly in DeFi platforms.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed continuously, and users can withdraw flexibly.

Advantages:

  • Automatically selects the best validator nodes.
  • Supports instant unstaking, which makes it ideal for flexible investors.

Disadvantages:

  • Users need to monitor DeFi pools and liquidity risks.

11. Jito (jitoSOL)

Platform: MEV-Optimized Solana Staking
Yield: APY of 7%-8% plus additional MEV rewards (+1%-3%).
Applicable Pools: Suitable for long-term stakers.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed periodically.

Advantages:

  • Optimized for MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) capture, which provides additional yield.
  • Stable and well-suited for long-term holders.

Disadvantages:

  • Less attractive for short-term investors.

Conclusion

Selecting the right staking or DeFi project depends on your risk tolerance, liquidity needs, and yield expectations. Solana official staking and Gate Exchange are solid choices for those seeking stable returns and lower risk. Meanwhile, DeFi platforms such as Raydium and Serum present more attractive opportunities for those willing to take on higher risks for potentially greater returns.

作者: Rachel
译者: Cedar
审校: SimonLiu、Piccolo、Elisa
译文审校: Ashley、Joyce
* 投资有风险,入市须谨慎。本文不作为 Gate.io 提供的投资理财建议或其他任何类型的建议。
* 在未提及 Gate.io 的情况下,复制、传播或抄袭本文将违反《版权法》,Gate.io 有权追究其法律责任。

Where to Maximize Returns on Your Staked SOL?

Intermediate3/28/2025, 9:01:07 AM
As the Solana ecosystem grows, more investors are exploring ways to maximize their earned SOL. Whether through official staking or participation in various DeFi projects, investors can enhance network security and liquidity while earning competitive returns. However, each approach has unique characteristics and potential risks, including yield fluctuations, liquidity constraints on staked assets, and smart contract vulnerabilities. This article explores Solana’s official staking, Kraken, Lido, Serum, Raydium, Tulip Protocol, and other leading platforms, and details their requirements, yields, staking pools, yield cycles, advantages, and disadvantages.

1. Solana Official Staking

Platform: Solana Network
Yield: Annual returns range from 6% to 8%, depending on the performance of the chosen validator.
Applicable Pools: No need to select specific pools; staking is done directly through a Solana wallet.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are automatically distributed every two epochs (approximately every two days).

Advantages:

  • Simple and secure staking process, ideal for long-term holders.
  • No reliance on third-party platforms, ensuring high transparency through the official wallet.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited liquidity; unstaking SOL requires a waiting period.
  • Validator performance can impact rewards.

2. Gate Exchange

Platform: Gate Exchange
Yield: Annual returns range from 6% to 8%.
Applicable Pools: Validator selection is automated based on platform strategy. It requires no manual selection.

Advantages:

  • Easy to use and reliable, ideal for users unfamiliar with technical aspects.
  • No minimum staking requirement, accessible to investors of all sizes.

Disadvantages:

  • A centralized platform where users do not fully control their staked assets, which poses platform risk.
  • Limited staking flexibility; withdrawals may have restrictions.

Security Measures:

  • Insurance funds and risk reserves to mitigate potential security incidents.
  • Strict KYC and AML policies ensure a secure trading environment.
  • Regular security testing and third-party audits to identify and fix vulnerabilities.

3. Lido

Platform: Lido (Cross-Chain Staking Platform)
Yield: Annual return of approximately 7%.
Applicable Pools: Lido offers SOL staking and issues stSOL tokens, which can be used in DeFi protocols.
Yield Cycle: stSOL tokens are immediately available for use in other DeFi platforms, which ensures high liquidity.

Advantages:

  • Holding stSOL allows users to earn additional yields on other DeFi platforms.
  • High flexibility, suitable for investors requiring liquidity.

Disadvantages:

  • Apart from staking rewards, DeFi platforms carry risks such as smart contract vulnerabilities and liquidity issues.
  • The value of stSOL may fluctuate significantly in volatile markets.

Security:

  • Lido consistently ranks high in TVL across multiple chains, particularly Ethereum.
  • Operates a decentralized validator selection model to mitigate risks and ensure stable staking rewards.

4. Serum

Platform: Decentralized Exchange (DEX)
Yield: Annual returns range from 10% to 30%, depending on trading volume and liquidity.
Applicable Pools: Users can provide SOL and other tokens (e.g., USDT, USDC, ETH) to liquidity pools and earn rewards.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are updated in real time and adjusted dynamically based on trading volume and liquidity.

Advantages:

  • Provides liquidity on a decentralized platform, which avoids centralized restrictions.
  • Fast transactions due to Solana’s high throughput; liquidity providers can earn more fees.

Disadvantages:

  • Returns may be unstable due to fluctuations in trading volume.
  • Token price volatility can impact pool earnings.

Security:

  • Serum has strong TVL performance and strict liquidity management within the Solana ecosystem.
  • Operates under a fully decentralized trading mechanism, with multiple third-party audits.
  • Features an on-chain order book and transparent liquidity pool management to mitigate risks and protect user funds.

5. Raydium

Platform: AMM (Automated Market Maker) & Liquidity Pools
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 10% to 25%, largely dependent on liquidity and trading volume.
Applicable Pools: Users must provide at least two tokens (e.g., SOL/USDT, SOL/USDC) for staking.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed in real-time through Raydium’s liquidity pools.

Advantages:

  • Offers high APY; suitable for users with liquid assets.
  • Low transaction fees are low, and the Solana ecosystem offers fast transaction speeds and strong liquidity.

Disadvantages:

  • Prone to slippage risk during market volatility.
  • Insufficient liquidity or low trading volume may impact returns.

Security:

  • Raydium operates a stable AMM platform on Solana with consistent TVL performance.
  • The platform uses an automated market-making mechanism combined with rigorous security audits and risk management measures.
  • Assets are fully protected during transactions by diversifying liquidity pool risks.

6. Tulip Protocol

Platform: Lending Protocol
Staking Requirements:
Tulip is a lending protocol on Solana that allows users to deposit SOL and other assets (e.g., USDC, USDT) to earn interest. Unlike traditional staking, users do not need to interact with other stakers but instead deposit assets into Tulip to receive rewards.
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 6% to 15%, depending on the asset type and market demand.
Yield Cycle: Interest is distributed daily or monthly based on market conditions.

Advantages:

  • No need for peer-to-peer staking; users can earn passive income simply by depositing assets.
  • Provides stable interest income, ideal for long-term investors.
  • Simple and user-friendly staking process.

Disadvantages:

  • Lending risks: Since the Tulip protocol relies on the lending market, if borrowers fail to repay loans, deposited assets may be at risk.
  • Smart contract risks: The Tulip protocol depends on smart contracts, which carry inherent technical risks. Vulnerabilities or attacks on the smart contracts could lead to asset loss.

7. Orca (SOL/USDC Whirlpool)

Platform: AMM & Liquidity Pools
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 8% to 15%; suitable for low-slippage concentrated liquidity pools.
Applicable Pools: Provides liquidity for pairs like SOL/USDC.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed in real-time and can be monitored at any time.

Advantages:

  • Supports custom price ranges, which makes it suitable for active liquidity management.
  • Low-slippage trading, ideal for stablecoin swaps.

Disadvantages:

  • Requires strong liquidity management skills, which makes it less suitable for beginners.
  • Liquidity risks remain, especially during high market volatility.

8. Mango Markets

Platform: Decentralized Trading & Lending
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 8% to 20%, depending on liquidity provision.
Applicable Pools: Users can earn rewards by providing liquidity for assets like SOL, USDT, and USDC.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are generated from trading fees and interest from lending markets, and are available at any time.

Advantages:

  • Offers leverage trading, which potentially amplifies returns.
  • Fully decentralized, it allows users to fully control their assets.

Disadvantages:

  • Leverage trading carries high risks, especially during volatile market conditions.
  • Low liquidity may impact expected returns.

Security:

  • As a decentralized trading and lending platform within the Solana ecosystem, Mango Markets maintains a strong TVL and risk control strategy. It employs distributed governance, multiple security audits, and risk mitigation mechanisms to safeguard funds during leverage trading and lending activities.

9. Saber

Platform: Focus on stablecoin liquidity pools
Yield: APY ranges from approximately 5% to 15%, influenced by liquidity and trading volume.
Applicable Pools: Primarily stablecoin pools (e.g., USDC, USDT).
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed through trading fees and liquidity mining, and are updated in real-time.

Advantages:

  • Stable returns, suitable for low-risk investors.
  • Provides a reliable yield source for long-term holders.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited earnings potential if liquidity is insufficient.
  • Market fluctuations may still affect overall yield, despite relative stability.

10. Marinade Finance (mSOL)

Platform: Solana Staking
Yield: Base yield around 7%-8%, with additional DeFi yields (+10%-15%) through mSOL/USDC LP staking.
Applicable Pools: mSOL can be used in liquidity pools, particularly in DeFi platforms.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed continuously, and users can withdraw flexibly.

Advantages:

  • Automatically selects the best validator nodes.
  • Supports instant unstaking, which makes it ideal for flexible investors.

Disadvantages:

  • Users need to monitor DeFi pools and liquidity risks.

11. Jito (jitoSOL)

Platform: MEV-Optimized Solana Staking
Yield: APY of 7%-8% plus additional MEV rewards (+1%-3%).
Applicable Pools: Suitable for long-term stakers.
Yield Cycle: Rewards are distributed periodically.

Advantages:

  • Optimized for MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) capture, which provides additional yield.
  • Stable and well-suited for long-term holders.

Disadvantages:

  • Less attractive for short-term investors.

Conclusion

Selecting the right staking or DeFi project depends on your risk tolerance, liquidity needs, and yield expectations. Solana official staking and Gate Exchange are solid choices for those seeking stable returns and lower risk. Meanwhile, DeFi platforms such as Raydium and Serum present more attractive opportunities for those willing to take on higher risks for potentially greater returns.

作者: Rachel
译者: Cedar
审校: SimonLiu、Piccolo、Elisa
译文审校: Ashley、Joyce
* 投资有风险,入市须谨慎。本文不作为 Gate.io 提供的投资理财建议或其他任何类型的建议。
* 在未提及 Gate.io 的情况下,复制、传播或抄袭本文将违反《版权法》,Gate.io 有权追究其法律责任。
即刻开始交易
注册并交易即可获得
$100
和价值
$5500
理财体验金奖励!