UK Prime Minister and Ukraine's President just had a call about what to do with those frozen Russian assets. Word is they're exploring options to put that money to work. Big question hovering over global finance right now - when governments freeze billions in assets, where does that capital actually end up? This conversation adds another layer to the ongoing debate about state power over financial resources.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotBot
· 7h ago
The matter of freezing assets, to put it simply, is just a handshake and reconciliation between major powers; where the money actually goes depends on whose fist is stronger.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 20h ago
Freezing assets seems to be a matter of power on the surface, but in reality, it is similar to contract permission control—without a clear definition of "withdrawal rights", this amount of money becomes an unresolved loophole. Historically, there have been too many similar audit cases, and unclear fund flows pose the greatest risk.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 20h ago
How to allocate frozen assets, in simple terms, is just a game of great powers; whoever holds the key has the final say.
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBro
· 20h ago
Freezing assets, to put it simply, is just playing a power game. Who has the final say?
UK Prime Minister and Ukraine's President just had a call about what to do with those frozen Russian assets. Word is they're exploring options to put that money to work. Big question hovering over global finance right now - when governments freeze billions in assets, where does that capital actually end up? This conversation adds another layer to the ongoing debate about state power over financial resources.