I don't want to get involved in other people's karma, nor do I want to benefit from tragedies, but I've been seeing too much of this lately. Despite my reluctance, I'm taking up everyone's public space to vent a few points:



1. Regardless of living conditions or family circumstances, if a limb amputation occurs, it's impossible that the patient wouldn't be treated at a major hospital. Although domestic medical care is gradually improving, severe amputation injuries like this must be handled by city-level hospitals. The environment in the pictures clearly isn't a city-level hospital.

2. The blogger probably genuinely doesn't understand amputation injuries. I've experienced this firsthand—in 2013 in Loudi, Hunan, a worker on my construction site suffered a crushing fracture of three toes on his right foot due to a mistake while dismantling a gantry crane. I was responsible for handling the situation immediately, so I have personal experience with amputation trauma.

3. Fingers and toes have abundant terminal blood vessels in the human body. After amputation, there's significant bleeding. Once the wound occurs, arterial tourniquets must be applied immediately above the limb (on the arm or thigh) to prevent rapid blood loss, with the wound facing upward to prevent acceleration of bleeding. Natural clotting cannot stop it, and it causes abnormal pain—initially numbness that gradually intensifies.

4. Amputation injuries require surgery within 2 hours; otherwise, if time extends, tissue cells die and reattachment becomes impossible. This includes bone, blood vessels, and fascia. This was the feedback doctors gave me in 2013. I'm unsure if this still applies with today's advanced medical care.

5. Before the amputation wound is sutured, IV drips cannot be administered, and the patient cannot even drink water, because water causes blood circulation to accelerate, increasing blood loss speed.

Finally, a few more thoughts:

Regardless of circumstances, I hope the patient in the pictures recovers well and stays healthy. Additionally, if you want to use platforms and social media for rights protection, if you genuinely want to protect your rights, you must state facts clearly and avoid unnecessary emotional language and emotional manipulation. Otherwise, you may only invite skepticism.

People pursue factual truth but are also susceptible to emotional provocation. Excessive emotional language actually causes people to lose rationality, which isn't conducive to rights protection itself. Facts should outweigh emotion, unless what you're seeking isn't facts but the feedback that emotion generates.

Furthermore, these past few days I've seen many people blindly following suit and showing compassion. A kind heart is admirable, but kindness requires rationality—don't let yourself be used as a weapon. Though noble people are judged by their actions rather than intentions, indiscriminate kindness isn't endearing either.

I'm just venting a few points on everyone's time. Please don't take this personally.
原文表示
このページには第三者のコンテンツが含まれている場合があり、情報提供のみを目的としております(表明・保証をするものではありません)。Gateによる見解の支持や、金融・専門的な助言とみなされるべきものではありません。詳細については免責事項をご覧ください。
  • 報酬
  • コメント
  • リポスト
  • 共有
コメント
0/400
コメントなし
  • ピン